Comparison of treatment effects between clear aligners and fixed appliances in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.

Objectives The biomechanics in achieving molar distalization may differ between fixed appliances and clear aligners in the control of tooth movement. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment effects between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances (FA) in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization. Methods The sample consisted of 46 subjects with mild-to-moderate crowding. A total of 22 patients treated with clear aligners (age, 25.66 ± 6.11 years old) and 24 patients treated with fixed appliances (age, 24.04 ± 4.95 years old) for miniscrew-assisted molar distalization were included in this study. The dental and skeletal changes were evaluated by the pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms. Results Significant changes were found with the vertical variables SN-OP angle (2.24 ± 3.22°, P  < .05) and SN-MP angle (0.73 ± 1.15°, P  < .05) for the FA group when compared with the CA group (SN-OP angle 0.41 ± 2.26° and SN-MP angle −0.21 ± 1.38°, P  > .05). Both treatment groups achieved a 2–3 mm. molar distalization with significant intrusion of the upper molars. The CA group showed significantly less distal tipping of molars (U6^PP angle −2.29 ± 3.29° and L6^MP angle −2.92 ± 2.49°, P  < .05) compared to the FA group (−5.24 ± 4.28° and −5.53 ± 5.03°, P  < .05). In addition, significant retraction and lingual inclination of the upper and lower incisors were found in both groups. Limitations The changes of tooth position were evaluated by 2D lateral cephalograms, not 3D measurements. Conclusions Compared to fixed appliances, clear aligners seemed to have better control of vertical dimension and distal tipping of molars in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]