Papillae, psammoma bodies, and/or many nuclear pseudoinclusions are helpful criteria but should not be required for a definitive cytologic diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: An institutional experience of 207 cases with surgical follow up.

Background: Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like features (NIFTP) was introduced in 2016 replacing noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma, with recommendations to label them "noncancer." To avoid reducing risk of malignancy (ROM) and overdiagnosing NIFTP as malignant, some authors required restricted cytologic criteria (RC) for a definitive diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), including papillae, psammoma bodies. or ≥3 nuclear pseudoinclusions. Since then, NIFTP criteria have been revised, biologic behavior better understood, and incidence reported to be much lower than initially anticipated. This study examines the impact of RC on PTC cytologic diagnoses, ROM, and detection of clinically significant carcinomas (CSC). Materials and Methods: A total of 207 thyroid FNAs originally diagnosed as PTC and suspicious for PTC (SPTC) with surgical follow‐up were evaluated. RC were retrospectively applied to cases as a requirement for diagnosing PTC, and cases that did not meet RC were reclassified as SPTC. ROMs and diagnostic accuracies of pre‐ and post‐RC diagnoses were correlated with followup CSC. Results: RC were met in 118/142 (83%) and 20/65 (31%) of cases originally diagnosed as PTC and SPTC, respectively. Post‐RC, 29% (19/65) of CSC originally diagnosed as SPTC were upgraded to PTC, and 17% (24/142) of CSC originally diagnosed as PTC were downgraded to SPTC. No NIFTPs were diagnosed as malignant. Conclusions: RC should not be required for a definitive diagnosis of PTC when other nuclear features of PTC are diffuse and overt. Applying RC, however, helps the pathologist arrive at a more definitive diagnosis of PTC in suspicious cases. Restrictive criteria are not required for a definitive diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma, but they are helpful in arriving at a definitive diagnosis in suspicious cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]