Back to Search Start Over

Enhancing European Management of Analgesia, Sedation, and Delirium: A Multinational, Prospective, Interventional Before-After Trial.

Authors :
Paul, Nicolas
Grunow, Julius J.
Rosenthal, Max
Spies, Claudia D.
Page, Valerie J.
Hanison, James
Patel, Brijesh
Rosenberg, Alex
von Haken, Rebecca
Pietsch, Urs
Schrag, Claudia
Waydhas, Christian
Schellongowski, Peter
Lobmeyr, Elisabeth
Sander, Michael
Piper, Sophie K.
Conway, Daniel
Totzeck, Andreas
Weiss, Björn
Source :
Neurocritical Care; Jun2024, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p898-908, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of a structured educational intervention on the implementation of guideline-recommended pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) assessment. Methods: This was a prospective, multinational, interventional before-after trial conducted at 12 intensive care units from 10 centers in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and the UK. Intensive care units underwent a 6-week structured educational program, comprising online lectures, instructional videos, educational handouts, and bedside teaching. Patient-level PAD assessment data were collected in three 1-day point-prevalence assessments before (T1), 6 weeks after (T2), and 1 year after (T3) the educational program. Results: A total of 430 patients were included. The rate of patients who received all three PAD assessments changed from 55% (107/195) at T1 to 53% (68/129) at T2, but increased to 73% (77/106) at T3 (p = 0.003). The delirium screening rate increased from 64% (124/195) at T1 to 65% (84/129) at T2 and 77% (82/106) at T3 (p = 0.041). The pain assessment rate increased from 87% (170/195) at T1 to 92% (119/129) at T2 and 98% (104/106) at T3 (p = 0.005). The rate of sedation assessment showed no signficiant change. The proportion of patients who received nonpharmacological delirium prevention measures increased from 58% (114/195) at T1 to 80% (103/129) at T2 and 91% (96/106) at T3 (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression revealed that at T3, patients were more likely to receive a delirium assessment (odds ratio [OR] 2.138, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.206–3.790; p = 0.009), sedation assessment (OR 4.131, 95% CI 1.372–12.438; p = 0.012), or all three PAD assessments (OR 2.295, 95% CI 1.349–3.903; p = 0.002) compared with T1. Conclusions: In routine care, many patients were not assessed for PAD. Assessment rates increased significantly 1 year after the intervention. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03553719. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15416933
Volume :
40
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Neurocritical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177624965
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01837-8