Back to Search
Start Over
Exploring how to trigger the use of patient-reported information for quality improvement in multi-stakeholder governance.
- Source :
- TQM Journal; 2024, Vol. 36 Issue 9, p22-39, 18p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Value-based healthcare suggested using patient-reported information to complement the information available in the medical records and administrative healthcare data to provide insights into patients' perceptions of satisfaction, experience and self-reported outcomes. However, little attention has been devoted to questions about factors fostering the use of patient-reported information to create value at the system level. Design/methodology/approach: Action research design is carried out to elicit possible triggers using the case of patient-reported experience and outcome data for breast cancer women along their clinical pathway in the clinical breast network of Tuscany (Italy). Findings: The case shows that communication and engagement of multi-stakeholder representation are needed for making information actionable in a multi-level, multispecialty care pathway organized in a clinical network; moreover, political and managerial support from higher level governance is a stimulus for legitimizing the use for quality improvement. At the organizational level, an external facilitator disclosing and discussing real-world uses of collected data is a trigger to link measures to action. Also, clinical champion(s) and clear goals are key success factors. Nonetheless, resource munificent and dedicated information support tools together with education and learning routines are enabling factors. Originality/value: Current literature focuses on key factors that impact performance information use often considering unidimensional performance and internal sources of information. The use of patient/user-reported information is not yet well-studied especially in supporting quality improvement in multi-stakeholder governance. The work appears relevant for the implications it carries, especially for policymakers and public sector managers when confronting the gap in patient-reported measures for quality improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17542731
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- TQM Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 177536732
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2023-0236