Back to Search Start Over

The Patient-Perceived Helpfulness of Measures Scale: Development and Validation of a Scale to Assess the Helpfulness of Using Measures in Psychological Treatment.

Authors :
Di Malta, Gina
Cooper, Mick
Bond, Julian
Raymond-Barker, Brett
Oza, Marsha
Pauli, Regina
Source :
Assessment; Jul2024, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p994-1010, 17p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In response to the increase in Routine Outcome Monitoring and Clinical Feedback, the Patient-Perceived Helpfulness of Measures Scale (ppHMS) was developed to assess the helpfulness—as perceived by patients—of using measures in psychological treatment. Study 1: The construct of patient-perceived helpfulness of measures was explored using thematic analysis with 15 patients. Six helpful and three unhelpful themes were identified and informed item development. Study 2: 28 items were formulated and rated by experts. Ten items were taken forward for psychometric shortening in a sample of 76 patients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) led to an adequately fitting six-item model with excellent internal consistency, and convergence with the Delighted-Terrible single item of product satisfaction and a single item of measure helpfulness. Study 3: In a stratified online sample of 514 U.K. psychotherapy patients, a five-item model constituted the best fit. The final ppHMS had excellent internal consistency (McDonald's ω =.90), convergent validity with psychotherapy satisfaction (r =.5; p <.001), divergence from social desirability (r =.1), and metric and scalar invariance across measures. Study 4: Analyses were replicated and confirmed in a stratified U.S. sample (n = 602). The ppHMS is a reliable and valid scale that can be used to assess and compare patients' perceptions of the helpfulness of different measures as part of their psychological treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10731911
Volume :
31
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Assessment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177534364
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231195837