Back to Search Start Over

Spinoza, Marx and Anti-Oedipus: A Labour Theory of Repression.

Authors :
Thomas, Kevin K.
Source :
Deleuze & Guattari Studies; May2024, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p177-200, 24p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

This paper contemplates repression as a factor of production in Anti-Oedipus. Repression is part of the division of labour which defines the composition of the labour–capital relation, what Deleuze and Guattari conceive of as a differential relation. In interpreting Deleuze and Guattari's concepts of repression, commentaries have elaborated on the influences of Marx's theories of reification and of the state. However, the influence of Marx's theory of division of labour in capitalism has not been fully examined. This theory, which involves dispossession of intellectual potentialities and suppression of productive drives, is essential to Deleuze and Guattari's Spinozist hypothesis that the masses came to desire fascism under a particular set of historical conditions. Through a reading of Capital, guided by Balibar's reading in particular, and an analysis of schizophrenia in alignment with Foucault's, Deleuze and Guattari develop a theory of repression as immanent to production. Based in this theory, they conceive of fascism as a line of flight from the limits of capital, emerging among several counteracting factors against the tendency for the rate of profit to fall. In assessing how repression operates in Deleuze and Guattari's form of psychoanalysis, this paper references Marx's Capital and Spinoza's Ethics as well as Balibar's contribution to the 1965 book Reading Capital and Foucault's 1962 Mental Illness and Psychology. The paper concludes with remarks on the further development of this theory in Deleuze and Guattari's 1980 A Thousand Plateaus and Deleuze's 1990 'Postscript on Control Societies'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23989777
Volume :
18
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Deleuze & Guattari Studies
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177376699
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2024.0550