Back to Search Start Over

Size specific dose estimation in pediatric CT: preliminary study and conversion factors.

Authors :
Zhang, Jian
Zhang, Xiaojun
Source :
Radiation Protection Dosimetry; May2024, Vol. 200 Issue 7, p677-686, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to compare the differences between volumetric CT dose index (CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript>) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript>) based on water equivalent diameter (WED) in radiation dose measurement, and explore a new method for fast calculation of SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript>. The imaging data of 1238 cases of head, 1152 cases of chest and 976 cases of abdominopelvic were analyzed retrospectively, and they were divided into five age groups: ≤ 0.5, 0.5 ~ ≤ 1, 1 ~ ≤ 5, 5 ~ ≤ 10 and 10 ~ ≤ 15 years according to age. The area of interest (A<subscript>R</subscript>), CT value (CT<subscript>R</subscript>), lateral diameter (LAT) and anteroposterior diameter (AP) of the median cross-sectional image of the standard scanning range and the SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> were manually calculated, and a t -test was used to compare the differences between CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript> and SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> in different age groups. Pearson analyzed the correlations between DE and age, DE and WED, f and age, and counted the means of conversion factors in each age group, and analyze the error ratios between SSDE calculated based on the mean age group conversion factors and actual measured SSDE. The CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript> in head was (9.41 ± 1.42) mGy and the SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> was (8.25 ± 0.70) mGy: the difference was statistically significant (t  = 55.04, P  < 0.001); the CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript> of chest was (2.68 ± 0.91) mGy and the SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> was (5.16 ± 1.16) mGy, with a statistically significant difference (t  = −218.78, P  < 0.001); the CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript> of abdominopelvic was (3.09 ± 1.58) mGy and the SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> was (5.89 ± 2.19) mGy: the difference was also statistically significant (t  = −112.28, P  < 0.001). The CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript> was larger than the SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> in the head except for the ≤ 0.5 year subgroup, and CTDI<subscript>VOL</subscript> was smaller than SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> within each subgroup in chest and abdominopelvic. There were strong negative correlations between f and age (head: r  = −0.81; chest: r  = −0.89; abdominopelvic: r  = −0.86; P  < 0.001). The mean values of f at each examination region were 0.81 ~ 1.01 for head, 1.65 ~ 2.34 for chest and 1.71 ~ 2.35 for abdominopelvic region. The SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> could be accurately estimated using the mean f of each age subgroup. SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> can more accurately measure the radiation dose of children. For children of different ages and examination regions, the SSDE<subscript>WED</subscript> conversion factors based on age subgroup can be quickly adjusted and improve the accuracy of radiation dose estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01448420
Volume :
200
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177375358
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae104