Back to Search Start Over

Lung (extracorporeal CO2 removal) and renal (continuous renal replacement therapy) support: the role of ultraprotective strategy in Covid 19 and non-Covid 19 ARDS. A case-control study.

Authors :
Pasero, Daniela
Pistidda, Laura
Piredda, Davide
Liperi, Corrado
Cossu, Andrea
Esposito, Raffaella
Muroni, Angela
Mereu, Cristiano
Rum, Carlino
Branca, Gian Pietro
Mulas, Franco
Puci, Mariangela
Sotgiu, Giovanni
Terragni, Pierpaolo
Source :
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia & Critical Care; 4/27/2024, Vol. 4, p1-16, 16p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Preliminary studies suggest that moderate ARDS and acute renal failure might benefit from extracorporeal CO<subscript>2</subscript> removal (ECCO<subscript>2</subscript>R) coupled with CRRT. However, evidence is limited and potential for this coupled treatment may need to be explored. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a protective driving pressure was obtained applying low-flow ECCO<subscript>2-</subscript>R plus CRRT in patients affected by moderate ARDS with COVID-19 compared to an historical group without COVID-19. Methods: A case-control study has been conducted comparing a group of consecutive moderate ARDS patients presenting AKI and affected by COVID-19, who needed low-flow ECCO<subscript>2-</subscript>R plus CRRT to achieve an ultra-protective ventilatory strategy, with historical group without COVID-19 that matched for clinical presentation and underwent the same ultra-protective treatment. V<subscript>T</subscript> was set at 6 mL/kg predicted body weight then ECCO<subscript>2</subscript>R was assessed to facilitate ultra-protective low V<subscript>T</subscript> ventilation to preserve safe Pplat and low driving pressure. Results: ECCO<subscript>2</subscript>R+CRRT reduced the driving pressure from 17 (14-18) to 11.5 (10-15) cmH<subscript>2</subscript>O (p<0.0004) in the fourteen ARDS patients by decreasing V<subscript>T</subscript> from 6.7 ml/kg PBW (6.1-6.9) to 5.1 (4.2-5.6) after 1 hour (p <0.0001). In the ARDS patients with COVID-19, the driving pressure reduction was more effective from baseline 18 (14-24) cmH<subscript>2</subscript>O to 11 (10-15) cmH<subscript>2</subscript>O (p<0.004), compared to the control group from 15 (13-17) to 12(10-16) cmH<subscript>2</subscript>O (p< 0.03), after one hour. ECCO<subscript>2</subscript>R+CRRT did not affected 28 days mortality in the two groups, while we observed a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-38} days; p=0.24) and ICU length of stay (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-78} days; p=0.25) in moderate ARDS patients with COVID-19 compared to control group. Conclusions: In moderate ARDS patients with or without COVID-19 disease, ECCO<subscript>2</subscript>R+CRRT may be and effective supportive treatment to reach protective values of driving pressure unless severe oxygenation defects arise requiring ECMO therapy initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
27313786
Volume :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia & Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177350309
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00164-4