Confirmation bias and quantitative approach in psychiatry: should ideological competing interests be declared?

This article explores confirmation bias and the quantitative approach in psychiatry, highlighting the influence of ideological competing interests on research. The authors argue for the disclosure of ideological biases in both qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide more objective information. They acknowledge the challenges of implementing such a policy, but believe that it can enhance trust and address concerns about bias. The article aims to contribute to the ongoing reflection on this topic and emphasizes the importance of considering context and ideology in psychiatric research for greater objectivity and trust in the results. [Extracted from the article]