Back to Search Start Over

Appraisal of Australian and New Zealand paediatric sepsis guidelines.

Authors :
Sasse, Rosemary
Borland, Meredith L
George, Shane
Jani, Shefali
Tan, Eunicia
Neutze, Jocelyn
Phillips, Natalie
Kochar, Amit
Craig, Simon
Lithgow, Anna
Rao, Arjun
Dalziel, Stuart R
Williams, Amanda
Babl, Franz E
Went, Grace
Long, Elliot
Source :
Emergency Medicine Australasia; Jun2024, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p436-442, 7p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are an important tool for the management of children with sepsis. The quality, consistency and concordance of Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) childhood sepsis CPGs with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (ACSQHC) sepsis clinical care standards and international sepsis guidelines is unclear. Methods: We accessed childhood sepsis CPGs for all ANZ states and territories through Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative members. The guidelines were assessed for quality using the AGREE‐II instrument. Consistency between CPG treatment recommendations was assessed, as was concordance with the ACSQHC sepsis clinical care standards and international sepsis guidelines. Results: Overall, eight CPGs were identified and assessed. CPGs used a narrative and pathway format, with those using both having the highest quality overall. CPG quality was highest for description of scope and clarity of presentation, and lowest for editorial independence. Consistency between guidelines for initial treatment recommendations was poor, with substantial variation in the choice and urgency of empiric antimicrobial administration; the choice, volume and urgency of fluid resuscitation; and the choice of first‐line vasoactive agent. Most CPGs were concordant with time‐critical components of the ACSQHC sepsis clinical care standard, although few addressed post‐acute care. Concordance with international sepsis guidelines was poor. Conclusion: Childhood sepsis CPGs in current use in ANZ are of variable quality and lack consistency with key treatment recommendations. CPGs are concordant with the ACSQHC care standard, but not with international sepsis guidelines. A bi‐national sepsis CPG may reduce unnecessary variation in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17426731
Volume :
36
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177322063
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14381