Back to Search Start Over

Semi-supervised auto-segmentation method for pelvic organ-at-risk in magnetic resonance images based on deep-learning.

Authors :
Xianan Li
Lecheng Jia
Fengyu Lin
Fan Chai
Tao Liu
Wei Zhang
Ziquan Wei
Weiqi Xiong
Hua Li
Min Zhang
Yi Wang
Source :
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics; Mar2024, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and purpose: In radiotherapy, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has higher contrast for soft tissues compared to computed tomography (CT) scanning and does not emit radiation. However, manual annotation of the deep learning-based automatic organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation algorithms is expensive, making the collection of large-high-quality annotated datasets a challenge. Therefore, we proposed the low-cost semi-supervised OAR segmentation method using small pelvic MR image annotations. Methods: We trained a deep learning-based segmentation model using 116 sets of MR images from 116 patients. The bladder, femoral heads, rectum, and small intestine were selected as OAR regions. To generate the training set, we utilized a semi-supervised method and ensemble learning techniques. Additionally, we employed a post-processing algorithm to correct the self -annotation data. Both 2D and 3D auto-segmentation networks were evaluated for their performance. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of semi-supervised method for 50 labeled data and only 10 labeled data. Results: The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the bladder, femoral heads, rectum and small intestine between segmentation results and reference masks is 0.954, 0.984, 0.908, 0.852 only using self -annotation and post-processing methods of 2D segmentation model.The DSC of corresponding OARs is 0.871, 0.975, 0.975, 0.783, 0.724 using 3D segmentation network, 0.896, 0.984, 0.890, 0.828 using 2D segmentation network and common supervised method. Conclusion: The outcomes of our study demonstrate that it is possible to train a multi-OAR segmentation model using small annotation samples and additional unlabeled data.To effectively annotate the dataset,ensemble learning and postprocessing methods were employed. Additionally, when dealing with anisotropy and limited sample sizes, the 2D model outperformed the 3D model in terms of performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15269914
Volume :
25
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177263905
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14296