Back to Search Start Over

A comparative assessment of biomethane potential of fresh fecal matter and fecal sludge and its correlation with malodor.

Authors :
Choudhury, Atun Roy
Singh, Neha
Lalwani, Jitesh
Rao, Mallikarjuna Goriparthi
Konyala, Bhanu Prakash
Nadella, Chiradeep
Nayakwadi, Abhishek
Palani, Sankar Ganesh
Source :
Environmental Science & Pollution Research; May2024, Vol. 31 Issue 21, p31619-31631, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Comprehensive and proper management of fecal sludge (FS) is an ongoing concern in many nations. Decentralized fecal sludge treatment plants (FSTPs) are effective in this regard; however, many have experienced strong public opposition based partly on suspicion of malodor. Fecal sludge and freshly generated fecal matter (FM) samples from various FSTPs were collected, characterized, and investigated for biomethane potential. The homogenized samples were anaerobically digested for 28 days. Digestion successfully reduced total suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand, and threshold odor number values of 97,350–97,420 mg/l, 43,230–43,260 mg/l, and 130–150 for FM, to 49,500–49,650 mg/l, 23,760–23,850 mg/l, and 3338, respectively, for FS samples. The comprehensive gas yield from Bhongir, Boduppal, and Shadnagar FS samples was 40, 55, and 31 ml, respectively. In contrast, cumulative gas generation from the FM was 26,361 ml. Digestion of FS samples also reduced concentrations of volatile solids and coliforms by 66–72% and 99%, respectively. Characterization of gas samples revealed methane and carbon dioxide concentrations as 56% and 22% for FM, and 0.4% and 61% for FS samples, respectively. Hydrogen sulfide and ammonia gas were absent in FS samples, dispelling common societal misconceptions of FSTPs being associated with malodor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09441344
Volume :
31
Issue :
21
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Environmental Science & Pollution Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177251407
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33289-8