Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of unsupervised shallow and deep models for structural health monitoring.

Authors :
Chalapathy, Raghavendra
Khoa, Nguyen Lu Dang
Source :
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering; Jun2024, Vol. 177 Issue 2, p107-117, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Recent failures of bridges worldwide highlight the need for robust structural health surveillance systems to provide alerts for early damage and prevent severe loss. Structural health monitoring (SHM) continues to evolve and gain wide adoption among asset managers to mitigate catastrophic failure risks of structural systems. With the prolific integration of SHM with artificial intelligence and internet of things systems becoming prevalent, several data-driven approaches have gained popularity in SHM. However, it is challenging to obtain ground-truth-labelled damage samples for supervised machine learning methods. A class of shallow machine learning methods known as unsupervised methods (e.g. the one-class support vector machine (OCSVM)), which only uses unlabelled data from a healthy state, has been shown to achieve promising results. However, shallow machine learning methods require laborious expert-crafted feature inputs for optimal performance. Inspired by the automatic feature-extraction ability of deep neural networks, unsupervised methods (deep learning models trained without supervisory ground truth labels) such as autoencoder (AE)-based methods were explored to detect structural damage. Results obtained on both real-world data from Sydney Harbour Bridge, one of Australia's iconic structures, and data collected from laboratory specimens demonstrate the effectiveness of the AE-based method over conventional shallow methods such as the OCSVM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14784637
Volume :
177
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177217769
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.21.00016