Back to Search Start Over

Modeling water flow and volumetric water content in a degraded peat comparing unimodal with bimodal porosity and flux with pressure head boundary condition.

Authors :
Davies, Mariel F.
Dietrich, Ottfried
Gerke, Horst H.
Merz, Christoph
Source :
Vadose Zone Journal; May2024, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p1-19, 19p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Degraded peatlands release large amounts of greenhouse gases. The development of effective mitigation and management measures requires an understanding of relevant site‐specific biogeochemical and hydraulic processes. However, the simulation of water fluxes and vadose zone state variables of degrading peatlands relies on proper process description, parameterization of hydraulic functions, and representation of the boundary conditions. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of unimodal versus bimodal soil hydraulic functions and pressure head versus flux‐type lower boundary conditions (LBCs) on the calculated hydraulic characteristics of a degraded peat profile. HYDRUS‐1D was used to study the hydraulic flow dynamics parameterized with data from a weighable groundwater lysimeter for the period from May 1 to December 31, 2019. Simulations comparing uni‐ and bimodal hydraulic functions showed only minor differences. Simulations of soil water pressure at a depth of 30 cm using a flux‐type LBC (RMSE: 27 cm, where RMSE is root mean square error) performed better than simulations using a pressure head LBC (RMSE: 48 cm). The pressure head LBC performed better at simulating volumetric water contents in 30‐cm depth than the flux LBC variant (RMSE: 0.05 vs. 0.09 cm3 cm−3). For specific site conditions with a shallow, fluctuating groundwater table and temporary air entrapment, the choice of LBC was important for a more accurate simulation of soil water fluxes and volumetric water content. Core Ideas: Understanding degraded peatland hydraulics based on groundwater lysimeter data.Simulation of the peat soil water balance as affected by water table dynamics.Comparing unimodal with bimodal soil hydraulic models in water balance simulation.Analyzing the choice of the lower boundary conditions by scenario simulations.Discussion on missing processes not accounted for to improve simulation results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15391663
Volume :
23
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Vadose Zone Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177192829
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20328