Back to Search Start Over

Optimum operations and performance comparison of CO2-propane and CO2-R152a mixture-based transcritical power cycles recovering diesel power plant waste heat.

Authors :
Mondal, Subha
Saha, Akash
De, Sudipta
Source :
Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy; May2024, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p1687-1702, 16p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Though CO<subscript>2</subscript> power cycles are preferred for diesel engine waste heat recovery, a very high operating pressure of the CO<subscript>2</subscript> power cycle is an issue of concern. To address this issue, in the present study, CO<subscript>2</subscript>-propane and CO<subscript>2</subscript>-R152a mixtures with various CO<subscript>2</subscript> mass fractions are proposed as the working fluid of a regenerative transcritical power cycle recovering waste heat of a diesel power plant. To reduce the possibility of accidental fire hazard; the minimum permissible CO<subscript>2</subscript> mass fraction is restricted to 0.3. It is observed that reducing CO<subscript>2</subscript> mass fraction ensures higher output power and lesser levelized electricity cost (LEC), specifically at a lower turbine inlet pressure. Between two considered CO<subscript>2</subscript>-based mixture pairs, the transcritical cycle exhibits a superior performance with CO<subscript>2</subscript>-R152a-based mixtures. The LEC of the presented CO<subscript>2</subscript>-propane-based optimized cycle is about 6.36% lower compared to that of the optimized supercritical CO<subscript>2</subscript> power cycle. For the CO<subscript>2</subscript>-R152a mixture-based cycle, the corresponding achievable reduction in LEC is about 15.20%. Turbine inlet pressures corresponding to the minimum LECs of the optimized CO<subscript>2</subscript>-propane and CO<subscript>2</subscript>-R152a mixture-based cycles are, respectively, close to 33% and 39% lower than that of the optimized supercritical CO<subscript>2</subscript> power cycle. As R152a is less flammable than propane, an R152a-based mixture working fluid also ensures a safer operation compared to a propane-based mixture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1618954X
Volume :
26
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177148437
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02489-0