Back to Search Start Over

Short-Term Practice Effects on Cognitive Tests Across the Late Life Cognitive Spectrum and How They Compare to Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors :
Duff, Kevin
Hammers, Dustin B.
Koppelmans, Vincent
King, Jace B.
Hoffman, John M.
Source :
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease; 2024, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p321-332, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Practice effects on cognitive testing in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) remain understudied, especially with how they compare to biomarkers of AD. Objective: The current study sought to add to this growing literature. Methods: Cognitively intact older adults (n = 68), those with amnestic MCI (n = 52), and those with mild AD (n = 45) completed a brief battery of cognitive tests at baseline and again after one week, and they also completed a baseline amyloid PET scan, a baseline MRI, and a baseline blood draw to obtain APOE ɛ4 status. Results: The intact participants showed significantly larger baseline cognitive scores and practice effects than the other two groups on overall composite measures. Those with MCI showed significantly larger baseline scores and practice effects than AD participants on the composite. For amyloid deposition, the intact participants had significantly less tracer uptake, whereas MCI and AD participants were comparable. For total hippocampal volumes, all three groups were significantly different in the expected direction (intact > MCI > AD). For APOE ɛ4, the intact had significantly fewer copies of ɛ4 than MCI and AD. The effect sizes of the baseline cognitive scores and practice effects were comparable, and they were significantly larger than effect sizes of biomarkers in 7 of the 9 comparisons. Conclusion: Baseline cognition and short-term practice effects appear to be sensitive markers in late life cognitive disorders, as they separated groups better than commonly-used biomarkers in AD. Further development of baseline cognition and short-term practice effects as tools for clinical diagnosis, prognostic indication, and enrichment of clinical trials seems warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13872877
Volume :
99
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177067900
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-231392