Surface Resistance Controls Differences in Evapotranspiration Between Croplands and Prairies in U.S. Corn Belt Sites.

Water returned to the atmosphere as evapotranspiration (ET) is approximately 1.6x global river discharge and has wide‐reaching impacts on groundwater and streamflow. In the U.S. Midwest, widespread land conversion from prairie to pasture to cropland has altered spatiotemporal patterns of ET, yet there is not consensus on the direction of change or the mechanisms controlling changes. We measured ET at three locations within the Long‐Term Agroecosystem Research network along a latitudinal gradient with paired rainfed cropland and prairie sites at each location. At the northern locations, the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB) and Kellogg Biological Station (KBS), the cropland has annual ET that is 84 and 29 mm/year (22% and 5%) higher, respectively, caused primarily by higher ET during springtime when fields are fallow. At the southern location, the Central Mississippi River Basin (CMRB), the prairie has 69 mm/year (11%) higher ET, primarily due to a longer growing season. Differences in climate and that the CMRB prairie is remnant native prairie, while the UMRB and KBS prairies are restored, make it challenging to attribute differences to specific mechanisms. To accomplish this, we examine the energy balance using the Two‐Resistance Method (TRM). Results from the TRM demonstrate that higher surface conductance in croplands is the primary factor leading to higher springtime ET from croplands, relative to prairies. Results from this study provide insight into impacts of warm season grasses on the hydrology of the U.S. Corn Belt by providing a mechanistic understanding of how land use change affects the water budget. Plain Language Summary: Evapotranspiration (ET) consists of evaporation from bare soil and plant leaves. ET is ∼1.6x greater than global river flow and has wide‐reaching impacts on groundwater and streamflow. In the U.S. Midwest, widespread land conversion from prairies to croplands has altered patterns of ET, yet there is no consensus on the direction of this change or the mechanisms controlling changes. In this study we use measurements of ET at three locations within the Long‐Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network that have paired cropland and prairie sites. Surprisingly, we found that in the two northern sites, the croplands had higher ET than the prairies, particularly during springtime when the croplands are fallow. We used mathematical analysis of the energy budget to show that a parameter called the surface conductance controls the differences in ET between the croplands and prairies. During springtime in prairies, the standing, dormant vegetation blocks transfer of water vapor from the land surface, reducing the surface conductance, and limits the ET. Results from this study provide insight into the impact of land conversion from prairies to croplands on the hydrology of the U.S. Corn Belt by providing a mechanistic understanding of how land use change affects the water budget. Key Points: Differences in evapotranspiration between croplands and prairies was quantified by a mechanistic Two Resistance MethodBowen ratio during springtime is higher in prairies than croplandsSurface resistance is the primary factor causing springtime evapotranspiration differences between croplands and prairies [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]