Back to Search Start Over

Performances of two rapid LAMP-based techniques for the intrapartum detection of Group B Streptococcus vaginal colonization.

Authors :
Charfi, Rym
Guyonnet, Cécile
Untrau, Meiggie
Giacometti, Gaëlle
Paper, Thierry
Poyart, Claire
Plainvert, Céline
Tazi, Asmaa
Source :
Annals of Clinical Microbiology & Antimicrobials; 4/25/2024, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p1-8, 8p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of invasive infections in newborns. The prevention of GBS neonatal disease relies on the administration of an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-colonized women. In recent years, rapid intrapartum detection of GBS vaginal colonization using real-time nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) emerged as an alternative to antenatal culture screening methods. Methods: We compared the performances of two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) tests, the Ampliflash® GBS and the PlusLife® GBS tests, to standard culture for GBS detection in vaginal specimens from pregnant women. The study was conducted from April to July 2023 in a French hospital of the Paris area. Results: A total of 303 samples were analyzed, including 85 culture-positive samples (28.1%). The Ampliflash® GBS test and the PlusLife® GBS tests gave a result for 100% and 96.3% tests, respectively. The performances of the tests were as follows: sensitivity 87.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.3–92.6) and 98.7% (95% CI 93.0-99.8), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 96.7–99.8), and 91.9% (95% CI 87.3–95.0), respectively. False negative results of the Ampliflash® GBS test correlated with low-density GBS cultures. Time-to-results correlated with GBS culture density only for the PlusLife® GBS test (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both techniques provide excellent analytical performances with high sensitivity and specificity together with a short turnaround time and results available in 10 to 35 min. Their potential to further reduce the burden of GBS neonatal disease compared with antenatal culture screening needs to be assessed in future clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14760711
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of Clinical Microbiology & Antimicrobials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176863353
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-024-00695-2