Back to Search Start Over

Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial.

Authors :
Rob, Daniel
Farkasovska, Klaudia
Kreckova, Marketa
Smid, Ondrej
Kavalkova, Petra
Macoun, Jaromir
Huptych, Michal
Havrankova, Petra
Gallo, Juraj
Pudil, Jan
Dusik, Milan
Havranek, Stepan
Linhart, Ales
Belohlavek, Jan
Source :
Critical Care; 4/16/2024, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach. Methods: The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment). Results: From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8–7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3). Conclusions: Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
28
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176651860
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04901-7