Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Analysis and Error Assessment of Nanoindentation Evaluation Techniques for NafionTM117.

Authors :
Yonkova, Velislava
Utsch, Nikolai
Borowec, Julian
Eichel, Rüdiger-A.
Hausen, Florian
Scheepers, Fabian
Brinckmann, Steffen
Schwaiger, Ruth
Source :
JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS); May2024, Vol. 76 Issue 5, p2315-2325, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Advances in the application of polymers for electrochemical cells require an understanding of their viscous deformation mechanisms and their interaction with moisture. Nanoindentation offers a localized, microscale testing alternative to traditional tensile testing. However, the viscoelastic nature of the polymers, combined with their increased compliance, presents challenges in the analysis of nanoindentation results. In addition, the dependence on moisture results in significant scatter and low repeatability. This study combines nanoindentation and tensile testing as a verification method and compares different correction protocols for static nanoindentation to investigate the mechanical behavior of polymer electrolyte membranes. Comparisons of different indentation devices, analysis methods, and indentation protocols show a significant overestimation of Young's modulus using the classical Oliver–Pharr method compared to values determined from tensile tests. Nanoindentation at different humidity levels revealed different mechanisms leading to a decrease in Young's modulus and hardness with increasing humidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10474838
Volume :
76
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176497828
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06485-7