Back to Search Start Over

The Effectiveness of Biological Agents on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis in Patients with Comorbid Asthma: A Multicenter Real-Life Study from Türkiye.

Authors :
Demir, Meryem
Tunakan Dalgic, Ceyda
Mete Gokmen, Emine Nihal
Savas, Recep
Eroglu, Suleyman
Ozden, Guzin
Orcen, Cihan
Pacaci Cetin, Gulden
Arslan, Bahar
Bilgir, Ferda
Bulut, Gokten
Akcam, Nurullah Yekta
Ozgul, Semiha
Cerci, Pamir
Coskun, Raif
Gode, Sercan
Yilmaz, Insu
Sin, Aytul Zerrin
Source :
Medicina (1010660X); Mar2024, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p448, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Real-life data on the efficacy of biologic agents (BAs) on asthma-comorbid CRSwNP are needed. Our primary goal is to investigate the effects of BAs on CRSwNP symptoms, as well as endoscopic and tomography scores. Our secondary goal is to show a reduction in the frequency of acute sinusitis exacerbations and the need for surgery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, real-life study. We screened the patients with asthma-comorbid CRSwNP treated with omalizumab or mepolizumab. A total of 69 patients (40 F/29 M; omalizumab n = 55, mepolizumab n = 14) were enrolled. We compared the visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal congestion score (NCS), Lund–Mackay computed tomography score (LMS), and total endoscopic polyp scores (TPS) before and after BAs. We evaluated the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) frequencies separately, according to the BAs. Results: The overall median (min–max) age was 43 (21–69) years. The median (min–max) of biologic therapy duration was 35 (4–113) months for omalizumab and 13.5 (6–32) for mepolizumab. Significant improvements were seen in VAS, SNOT-22, and NCS with omalizumab and mepolizumab. A significant decrease was observed in TPS with omalizumab [95% CI: 0–4] (p < 0.001), but not with mepolizumab [95% CI: −0.5–2] (p = 0.335). The frequency of ESS and AECRS were significantly reduced with omalizumab [95% CI: 2–3] (p < 0.001) and [95% CI: 2–5] (p < 0.001); and mepolizumab [95% CI: 0–2] (p = 0.002) and [95% CI: 2–8.5] (p < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in LMS with either of the BAs. Conclusions: Omalizumab and mepolizumab can provide a significant improvement in the sinonasal symptom scores. BAs are promising agents for CRSwNP patients with frequent exacerbations and multiple surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1010660X
Volume :
60
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Medicina (1010660X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176366079
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60030448