Back to Search Start Over

Accurate detection and grading of pterygium through smartphone by a fusion training model.

Authors :
Yuwen Liu
Changsheng Xu
Shaopan Wang
Yuguang Chen
Xiang Lin
Shujia Guo
Zhaolin Liu
Yuqian Wang
Houjian Zhang
Yuli Guo
Caihong Huang
Huping Wu
Ying Li
Qian Chen
Jiaoyue Hu
Zhiming Luo
Zuguo Liu
Source :
British Journal of Ophthalmology; Mar2024, Vol. 108 Issue 3, p336-342, 16p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background/aims To improve the accuracy of pterygium screening and detection through smartphones, we established a fusion training model by blending a large number of slit-lamp image data with a small proportion of smartphone data. Method Two datasets were used, a slit-lamp image dataset containing 20 987 images and a smartphone-based image dataset containing 1094 images. The RFRC (Faster RCNN based on ResNet101) model for the detection model. The SRU-Net (U-Net based on SE-ResNeXt50) for the segmentation models. The open-cv algorithm measured the width, length and area of pterygium in the cornea. Results The detection model (trained by slit-lamp images) obtained the mean accuracy of 95.24%. The fusion segmentation model (trained by smartphone and slit-lamp images) achieved a microaverage F1 score of 0.8981, sensitivity of 0.8709, specificity of 0.9668 and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9295. Compared with the same group of patients' smartphone and slit-lamp images, the fusion model performance in smartphone-based images (F1 score of 0.9313, sensitivity of 0.9360, specificity of 0.9613, AUC of 0.9426, accuracy of 92.38%) is close to the model (trained by slit-lamp images) in slit-lamp images (F1 score of 0.9448, sensitivity of 0.9165, specificity of 0.9689, AUC of 0.9569 and accuracy of 94.29%). Conclusion Our fusion model method got high pterygium detection and grading accuracy in insufficient smartphone data, and its performance is comparable to experienced ophthalmologists and works well in different smartphone brands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00071161
Volume :
108
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176168774
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-322552