Back to Search Start Over

Analysis of Characteristics and Risk Factors of Patients with Single Gastric Cancer and Synchronous Multiple Gastric Cancer among 14,603 Patients.

Authors :
Du Hyun Song
Nayoung Kim
Hyeong Ho Jo
Sangbin Kim
Yonghoon Choi
Hyeon Jeong Oh
Hye Seung Lee
Hyuk Yoon
Cheol Min Shin
Young Soo Park
Dong Ho Lee
So Hyun Kang
Young Suk Park
Sang-Hoon Ahn
Yun-Suhk Suh
Do Joong Park
Hyung Ho Kim
Ji-Won Kim
Jin Won Kim
Keun-Wook Lee
Source :
Gut & Liver; Mar2024, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p231-244, 14p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background/Aims: Synchronous multiple gastric cancer (SMGC) accounts for approximately 6% to 14% of gastric cancer (GC) cases. This study aimed to identify risk factors for SMGC. Methods: A total of 14,603 patients diagnosed with GC were prospectively enrolled. Data including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, family history, p53 expression, microsatellite instability, cancer classification, lymph node metastasis, and treatment were collected. Risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis between a single GC and SMGC. Results: The incidence of SMGC was 4.04%, and that of early GC (EGC) and advanced GC (AGC) was 5.43% and 3.11%, respectively. Patients with SMGC were older (65.33 years vs 61.75 years, p<0.001) and more likely to be male. Lymph node metastasis was found in 27% of patients with SMGC and 32% of patients with single GC. Multivariate analysis showed that SMGC was associated with sex (male odds ratio [OR], 1.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.223 to 2.278; p=0.001), age (≥65 years OR, 1.532; 95% CI, 1.169 to 2.008; p=0.002), and EGC (OR, 1.929; 95% CI, 1.432 to 2.600; p<0.001). Survival rates were affected by Lauren classification, sex, tumor size, cancer type, distant metastasis, and venous invasion but were not related to the number of GCs. However, the survival rate of AGC with SMGC was very high. Conclusions: SMGC had unique characteristics such as male sex, older age, and EGC, and the survival rate of AGC, in which the intestinal type was much more frequent, was very good, [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19762283
Volume :
18
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Gut & Liver
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176108754
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl220491