Back to Search Start Over

Early pseudoprogression and progression lesions in glioblastoma patients are both metabolically heterogeneous.

Authors :
Ungan, Gülnur
Pons‐Escoda, Albert
Ulinic, Daniel
Arús, Carles
Ortega‐Martorell, Sandra
Olier, Ivan
Vellido, Alfredo
Majós, Carles
Julià‐Sapé, Margarida
Source :
NMR in Biomedicine; Apr2024, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The standard treatment in glioblastoma includes maximal safe resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide. The first follow‐up study to evaluate treatment response is performed 1 month after concomitant treatment, when contrast‐enhancing regions may appear that can correspond to true progression or pseudoprogression. We retrospectively evaluated 31 consecutive patients at the first follow‐up after concomitant treatment to check whether the metabolic pattern assessed with multivoxel MRS was predictive of treatment response 2 months later. We extracted the underlying metabolic patterns of the contrast‐enhancing regions with a blind‐source separation method and mapped them over the reference images. Pattern heterogeneity was calculated using entropy, and association between patterns and outcomes was measured with Cramér's V. We identified three distinct metabolic patterns—proliferative, necrotic, and responsive, which were associated with status 2 months later. Individually, 70% of the patients showed metabolically heterogeneous patterns in the contrast‐enhancing regions. Metabolic heterogeneity was not related to the regions' size and only stable patients were less heterogeneous than the rest. Contrast‐enhancing regions are also metabolically heterogeneous 1 month after concomitant treatment. This could explain the reported difficulty in finding robust pseudoprogression biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09523480
Volume :
37
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
NMR in Biomedicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176078035
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5095