Feasibility of bone marrow edema detection using dual‐energy cone‐beam computed tomography.

Background: Dual‐energy (DE) detection of bone marrow edema (BME) would be a valuable new diagnostic capability for the emerging orthopedic cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems. However, this imaging task is inherently challenging because of the narrow energy separation between water (edematous fluid) and fat (health yellow marrow), requiring precise artifact correction and dedicated material decomposition approaches. Purpose: We investigate the feasibility of BME assessment using kV‐switching DE CBCT with a comprehensive CBCT artifact correction framework and a two‐stage projection‐ and image‐domain three‐material decomposition algorithm. Methods: DE CBCT projections of quantitative BME phantoms (water containers 100–165 mm in size with inserts presenting various degrees of edema) and an animal cadaver model of BME were acquired on a CBCT test bench emulating the standard wrist imaging configuration of a Multitom Rax twin robotic x‐ray system. The slow kV‐switching scan protocol involved a 60 kV low energy (LE) beam and a 120 kV high energy (HE) beam switched every 0.5° over a 200° angular span. The DE CBCT data preprocessing and artifact correction framework consisted of (i) projection interpolation onto matched LE and HE projections views, (ii) lag and glare deconvolutions, and (iii) efficient Monte Carlo (MC)‐based scatter correction. Virtual non‐calcium (VNCa) images for BME detection were then generated by projection‐domain decomposition into an Aluminium (Al) and polyethylene basis set (to remove beam hardening) followed by three‐material image‐domain decomposition into water, Ca, and fat. Feasibility of BME detection was quantified in terms of VNCa image contrast and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Robustness to object size, position in the field of view (FOV) and beam collimation (varied 20–160 mm) was investigated. Results: The MC‐based scatter correction delivered > 69% reduction of cupping artifacts for moderate to wide collimations (> 80 mm beam width), which was essential to achieve accurate DE material decomposition. In a forearm‐sized object, a 20% increase in water concentration (edema) of a trabecular bone‐mimicking mixture presented as ∼15 HU VNCa contrast using 80–160 mm beam collimations. The variability with respect to object position in the FOV was modest (< 15% coefficient of variation). The areas under the ROC curve were > 0.9. A femur‐sized object presented a somewhat more challenging task, resulting in increased sensitivity to object positioning at 160 mm collimation. In animal cadaver specimens, areas of VNCa enhancement consistent with BME were observed in DE CBCT images in regions of MRI‐confirmed edema. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the proposed artifact correction and material decomposition pipeline can overcome the challenges of scatter and limited spectral separation to achieve relatively accurate and sensitive BME detection in DE CBCT. This study provides an important baseline for clinical translation of musculoskeletal DE CBCT to quantitative, point‐of‐care bone health assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]