Back to Search Start Over

In‐house virtual surgical planning and guided mandibular reconstruction is less precise, but more economical and time‐efficient than commercial procedures.

Authors :
Block, Ole Moritz
Khromov, Tatjana
Hoene, Georg
Schliephake, Henning
Brockmeyer, Phillipp
Source :
Head & Neck; Apr2024, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p871-883, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: To compare an in‐house and a commercially available surgical planning solution for mandibular reconstruction in terms of postoperative reconstruction accuracy and economic benefit. Methods: Twenty‐nine consecutive patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) requiring segmental mandibular reconstruction were enrolled. Fifteen patients underwent in‐house surgical planning and 14 patients underwent a commercially available planning solution. A morphometric comparison of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) data sets and a cost–benefit comparison were performed. Results: Volumes of planned and reconstructed bone segments differed significantly for both in‐house planning (p = 0.0431) and commercial planning (p < 0.0001). Significant differences in osteotomy angles were demonstrated for in‐house planning (p = 0.0391). Commercial planning was superior to in‐house planning for total mandibular deviation (p = 0.0217), intersegmental space volumes (p = 0.0035), and lengths (p = 0.0007). No significant difference was found between the two planning solutions in terms of intersegmental ossification and the incidence of wound healing disorders. In‐house planning took less time than commercial planning (p < 0.0001). Component manufacturing costs (p < 0.0001) and total cumulative costs (p < 0.0001) were significantly lower for in‐house planning. Conclusions: In‐house surgical planning is less accurate but has a cost advantage and could be performed in less time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10433074
Volume :
46
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Head & Neck
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175988435
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27642