Back to Search Start Over

Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for serious complications after emergency laparotomy.

Authors :
Kokkinakis, Stamatios
Kritsotakis, Evangelos I.
Paterakis, Konstantinos
Karali, Garyfallia-Apostolia
Malikides, Vironas
Kyprianou, Anna
Papalexandraki, Melina
Anastasiadis, Charalampos S.
Zoras, Odysseas
Drakos, Nikolas
Kehagias, Ioannis
Kehagias, Dimitrios
Gouvas, Nikolaos
Kokkinos, Georgios
Pozotou, Ioanna
Papatheodorou, Panayiotis
Frantzeskou, Kyriakos
Schizas, Dimitrios
Syllaios, Athanasios
Palios, Ifaistion M.
Source :
European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery; Feb2024, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p283-293, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a common operation with high risk for postoperative complications, thereby requiring accurate risk stratification to manage vulnerable patients optimally. We developed and internally validated a predictive model of serious complications after EL. Methods: Data for eleven carefully selected candidate predictors of 30-day postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > = 3) were extracted from the HELAS cohort of EL patients in 11 centres in Greece and Cyprus. Logistic regression with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was applied for model development. Discrimination and calibration measures were estimated and clinical utility was explored with decision curve analysis (DCA). Reproducibility and heterogeneity were examined with Bootstrap-based internal validation and Internal–External Cross-Validation. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS-NSQIP) model was applied to the same cohort to establish a benchmark for the new model. Results: From data on 633 eligible patients (175 complication events), the SErious complications After Laparotomy (SEAL) model was developed with 6 predictors (preoperative albumin, blood urea nitrogen, American Society of Anaesthesiology score, sepsis or septic shock, dependent functional status, and ascites). SEAL had good discriminative ability (optimism-corrected c-statistic: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–0.81), calibration (optimism-corrected calibration slope: 1.01, 95% CI 0.99–1.03) and overall fit (scaled Brier score: 25.1%, 95% CI 24.1–26.1%). SEAL compared favourably with ACS-NSQIP in all metrics, including DCA across multiple risk thresholds. Conclusion: SEAL is a simple and promising model for individualized risk predictions of serious complications after EL. Future external validations should appraise SEAL's transportability across diverse settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18639933
Volume :
50
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175931898
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02351-4