Back to Search Start Over

Impact of mechanical power and positive end expiratory pressure on central vs. mixed oxygen and carbon dioxide related variables in a population of female piglets.

Authors :
Fioccola, Antonio
Pozzi, Tommaso
Fratti, Isabella
Nicolardi, Rosmery Valentina
Romitti, Federica
Busana, Mattia
Collino, Francesca
Camporota, Luigi
Meissner, Konrad
Moerer, Onnen
Gattinoni, Luciano
Source :
Physiological Reports; Feb2024, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: The use of the pulmonary artery catheter has decreased overtime; central venous blood gases are generally used in place of mixed venous samples. We want to evaluate the accuracy of oxygen and carbon dioxide related parameters from a central versus a mixed venous sample, and whether this difference is influenced by mechanical ventilation. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 78 healthy female piglets ventilated with different mechanical power. Results: There was a significant difference in oxygen‐derived parameters between samples taken from the central venous and mixed venous blood (Sv¯$$ \overline{v} $$O2 = 74.6%, ScvO2 = 83%, p < 0.0001). Conversely, CO2‐related parameters were similar, with strong correlation. Ventilation with higher mechanical power and PEEP increased the difference between oxygen saturations, (Δ[ScvO2−Sv¯$$ \overline{v} $$O2 ] = 7.22% vs. 10.0% respectively in the low and high MP groups, p = 0.020); carbon dioxide‐related parameters remained unchanged (p = 0.344). Conclusions: The venous oxygen saturation (central or mixed) may be influenced by the effects of mechanical ventilation. Therefore, central venous data should be interpreted with more caution when using higher mechanical power. On the contrary, carbon dioxide‐derived parameters are more stable and similar between the two sampling sites, independently of mechanical power or positive end expiratory pressures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2051817X
Volume :
12
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Physiological Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175671173
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15954