A response to a single cadaver study assessing the efficacy of two commercially available devices for airway foreign body relief.

This article is a response to a single cadaver study that assessed the efficacy of two airway clearance devices, including the LifeVac device. The author criticizes the methodology and conclusions of the study, arguing that it lacks rigor and validity. They highlight errors in the research methodology and testing regime, as well as unsupported speculative conclusions made by the authors. The author also questions the bias and misrepresentation of evidence in the study. They argue that the LifeVac device has shown efficacy in multiple studies and should not be dismissed based on this single cadaver study. [Extracted from the article]