Back to Search Start Over

Next generation sequencing of high-grade adult-type diffuse glioma in the Netherlands: interlaboratory variation in the primary diagnostic and recurrent setting.

Authors :
van Opijnen, Mark P.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
Cuppen, Edwin
Dubbink, Hendrikus J.
ter Elst, Arja
van Eijk, Ronald
Mühlebner, Angelika
Jansen, Casper
van der Geize, Robert
Speel, Ernst-Jan M.
Groenen, Patricia J. T. A.
de Vos, Filip Y. F.
Wesseling, Pieter
de Leng, Wendy W. J.
Maas, Sybren L. N.
Source :
Journal of Neuro-Oncology; Feb2024, Vol. 166 Issue 3, p485-492, 8p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Next generation sequencing (NGS) is an important tool used in clinical practice to obtain the required molecular information for accurate diagnostics of high-grade adult-type diffuse glioma (HGG). Since individual centers use either in-house produced or standardized panels, interlaboratory variation could play a role in the practice of HGG diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the current practice in NGS application for both primary and recurrent HGG. Methods: This nationwide Dutch survey used the expertise of (neuro)pathologists and clinical scientists in molecular pathology (CSMPs) by sending online questionnaires on clinical and technical aspects. Primary outcome was an overview of panel composition in the different centers for diagnostic practice of HGG. Secondary outcomes included practice for recurrent HGG and future perspectives. Results: Out of twelve neuro-oncology centers, the survey was filled out by eleven (neuro)pathologists and seven CSMPs. The composition of the diagnostic NGS panels differed in each center with numbers of genes ranging from 12 to 523. Differences are more pronounced when tests are performed to find therapeutic targets in the case of recurrent disease: about half of the centers test for gene fusions (60%) and tumor mutational burden (40%). Conclusion: Current notable interlaboratory variations as illustrated in this study should be reduced in order to refine diagnostics and improve precision oncology. In-house developed tests, standardized panels and routine application of broad gene panels all have their own advantages and disadvantages. Future research would be of interest to study the clinical impact of variation in diagnostic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0167594X
Volume :
166
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175530682
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04568-8