Back to Search Start Over

Current Practices in Voice Data Collection and Limitations to Voice AI Research: A National Survey.

Authors :
Evangelista, Emily
Kale, Rohan
McCutcheon, Desiree
Rameau, Anais
Gelbard, Alexander
Powell, Maria
Johns, Michael
Law, Anthony
Song, Phillip
Naunheim, Matthew
Watts, Stephanie
Bryson, Paul C.
Crowson, Matthew G.
Pinto, Jeremy
Bensoussan Yael, E.
Olivier, Elemento
Anaïs, Rameau
Alexandros, Sigaras
Satrajit, Ghosh
Powell Maria, E.
Source :
Laryngoscope; Mar2024, Vol. 134 Issue 3, p1333-1339, 7p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Accuracy and validity of voice AI algorithms rely on substantial quality voice data. Although commensurable amounts of voice data are captured daily in voice centers across North America, there is no standardized protocol for acoustic data management, which limits the usability of these datasets for voice artificial intelligence (AI) research. Objective: The aim was to capture current practices of voice data collection, storage, analysis, and perceived limitations to collaborative voice research. Methods: A 30‐question online survey was developed with expert guidance from the voicecollab.ai members, an international collaborative of voice AI researchers. The survey was disseminated via REDCap to an estimated 200 practitioners at North American voice centers. Survey questions assessed respondents' current practices in terms of acoustic data collection, storage, and retrieval as well as limitations to collaborative voice research. Results: Seventy‐two respondents completed the survey of which 81.7% were laryngologists and 18.3% were speech language pathologists (SLPs). Eighteen percent of respondents reported seeing 40%–60% and 55% reported seeing >60 patients with voice disorders weekly (conservative estimate of over 4000 patients/week). Only 28% of respondents reported utilizing standardized protocols for collection and storage of acoustic data. Although, 87% of respondents conduct voice research, only 38% of respondents report doing so on a multi‐institutional level. Perceived limitations to conducting collaborative voice research include lack of standardized methodology for collection (30%) and lack of human resources to prepare and label voice data adequately (55%). Conclusion: To conduct large‐scale multi‐institutional voice research with AI, there is a pertinent need for standardization of acoustic data management, as well as an infrastructure for secure and efficient data sharing. Level of Evidence: 5 Laryngoscope, 134:1333–1339, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0023852X
Volume :
134
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Laryngoscope
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175502289
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31052