Back to Search
Start Over
What the Remnant Person Problem Really Implies.
- Source :
- Acta Analytica; Dec2023, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p667-687, 21p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- The goal of this paper is to defend animalism from the remnant person problem. Specifically, I argue that animalism is consistent with the view that one could become a remnant person in virtue of psychological continuity. For this argument, I show that the dilemma for the remnant person parallels the dilemma animalists use when they argue that one could become a human vegetable or corpse. I then argue that animalists who claim that psychological continuity is not necessary for our persistence through time should say that biological continuity is not necessary either. This implies that psychological continuity is sufficient, though not necessary, for personal identity over time in some cases. Finally, I show how my argument points animalists toward anti-criterialism and defend it from a fission problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03535150
- Volume :
- 38
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Acta Analytica
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 175454900
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-023-00545-4