Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions on function and occupational performance among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Authors :
Sheerin, Margo
O'Riordan, Cliona
Conneely, Mairead
Carey, Leonora
Ryan, Damien
Galvin, Rose
Morrissey, Ann‐Marie
Source :
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal; Feb2024, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p175-189, 15p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with conservatively managed conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Methods: Searches were carried out in CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and PubMed. Grey literature was searched for via Google Scholar. A systematic literature search was undertaken for randomised studies that examined occupational therapy interventions for treatment of hand, wrist, and forearm conditions. The primary outcome was function, with secondary outcomes of occupational performance, satisfaction with occupational performance, pain, and quality of life. Meta‐analyses were completed, and GRADE was used to determine the certainty of evidence. Results: Twelve studies with 1429 participants were identified. Interventions included combinations of occupation‐based intervention, assistive device provision, education, orthosis provision, and exercise programmes for arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and fracture and tendon injuries of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Occupational therapy resulted in an improvement of function (REM, SMD −0.27, 95% CI −0.00 to −0.53, I2 = 69%, low certainty evidence) (p = 0.05), occupational performance (REM, SMD 0.83, 95% CI 1.61–0.06, I2 = 91%, low certainty evidence) (p = 0.04), satisfaction with occupational performance (REM, SMD 0.74, 95% CI 1.42–0.05, I2 = 89%, low certainty evidence) (p = 0.03), and pain reduction (FEM, MD −1.35, 95% CI −0.84 to −1.86, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence) (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Further high‐quality research is recommended to determine the effects of occupational therapy interventions on specific upper limb conditions, inclusive of a broader range of clinical and patient reported outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00450766
Volume :
71
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175448302
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12905