Back to Search Start Over

Effect of myopia‐control lenses on central and peripheral visual performance in myopic children.

Authors :
Wu, Junqian
Li, Xue
Huang, Yingying
Luo, Yifan
Zhang, Siqi
Cui, Zaifeng
Hou, Fang
Bao, Jinhua
Chen, Hao
Source :
Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics; Mar2024, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p249-257, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the short‐term effects of three myopia‐control lenses, which impose peripheral myopic defocus while providing clear central vision, on central and peripheral visual performance in myopic children. Methods: Twenty‐one myopic children were enrolled in the study. Central visual performance was assessed using the quick contrast sensitivity function. Peripheral visual performance was evaluated by measuring peripheral contrast threshold and global motion perception, while subjects maintained fixation through the central portion of the lens. Single‐vision spectacle lenses (SVL), spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) and defocus‐incorporated soft contact (DISC) lenses were evaluated in random order, followed by orthokeratology (OK) lenses. All tests were performed monocularly on the right eye. Results: The area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) with DISC lenses was lower than that with SVL (1.14 vs. 1.40, p < 0.001) and HAL (1.14 vs. 1.33, p = 0.001). HAL increased the temporal visual field contrast threshold compared with OK lenses (p = 0.04), and OK lenses decreased the superior visual field contrast threshold compared with that of SVL (p = 0.04) and HAL (p = 0.005). HAL also increased the peripheral coherence threshold for identifying the contraction movement compared with OK lenses (p = 0.01). Conclusions: The short‐term use of these optical interventions for myopia control exhibited measurable differences in central and peripheral visual performance. Relevant attention could be paid to these differences, especially when children switch to different treatments. DISC lenses exhibited worse central contrast sensitivity than SVL and HAL. Imposing peripheral defocus signals did not affect children's peripheral visual performance compared with SVL. However, considering the poorer peripheral visual performance provided by HAL, OK lenses are recommended for children if there are specific demands for global scene recognition and motion perception. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02755408
Volume :
44
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175305034
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13257