Back to Search Start Over

Meta-analysis of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria interaction with host plants: implications for drought stress response gene expression.

Authors :
Ferrante, Roberta
Campagni, Chiara
Vettori, Cristina
Checcucci, Alice
Garosi, Cesare
Paffetti, Donatella
Source :
Frontiers in Plant Science; 2024, p1-13, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: The molecular and physiological mechanisms activated in plants during drought stress tolerance are regulated by several key genes with both metabolic and regulatory roles. Studies focusing on crop gene expression following plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation may help understand which bioinoculant is closely related to the induction of abiotic stress responses. Methods: Here, we performed a meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to summarise information regarding plant-PGPR interactions, focusing on the regulation of nine genes involved in plant drought stress response. The literature research yielded 3,338 reports, of which only 41 were included in the meta-analysis based on the chosen inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed on four genes (ACO, APX, ACS and DREB2); the other five genes (ERD15, MYB, MYC, acdS, WRKY) had an insufficient number of eligible articles. Results: Forest plots obtained through each meta-analysis showed that the overexpression of ACO, APX, ACS and DREB2 genes was not statistically significant. Unlike the other genes, DREB2 showed statistically significant results in both the presence and absence of PGPR. Considering I2>75 %, the results showed a high heterogeneity among the studies included, and the cause for this was examined using subgroup analysis. Moreover, the funnel plot and Egger's test showed that the analyses were affected by strong publication bias. Discussion: This study argues that the presence of PGPR may not significantly influence the expression of drought stress response-related crop genes. This finding may be due to high heterogeneity, lack of data on the genes examined, and significant publication bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664462X
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Plant Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175224051
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1282553