Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison between absorbable dressing (Reso‐Pac®) and eugenol‐free dressing (Coe‐pak) after surgical removal of gingival pigmentation.
- Source :
- Oral Surgery (1752-2471); Feb2024, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p4-10, 7p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objective: Many dressings are used after the surgical removal of gingival pigmentation. This study aims to compare absorbed dressing (Reso‐Pac®) and eugenol‐free dressing (Coe‐pak) in accelerating wound healing, re‐epithelization and reducing pain after surgical removal of gingival pigmentation using a surgical scalpel. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) used a split‐mouth design. According to Hedin's classification, 10 patients with maxillary physiological gingival pigmentation class 3 and 4 were selected. Reso‐Pac® and Coe‐pak were randomly applied on each side after surgery. Landry's scale was used to assess healing index, and re‐epithelization was evaluated using toluidine blue stain. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Induced pain was evaluated after 1 week by applying airflow on each side for 5 s using VAS. Results: The study group had higher but insignificant differences after 1 and 2 weeks in healing index and re‐epithelization. Pain was insignificantly higher in study group after 2 h but insignificantly higher in the control group in days (1–5). Induced pain was significantly higher (p = 0.015) in the control group after 1 week. Conclusion: Reso‐Pac® can be considered as a viable alternative for Coe‐pak due to its effects in pain reduction and accelerating wound healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- GINGIVAL grafts
GINGIVA
TOLUIDINE blue
WOUND healing
VISUAL analog scale
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17522471
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Oral Surgery (1752-2471)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 174780303
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12830