Transportability of bacterial infection prediction models for critically ill patients.

Objective Bacterial infections (BIs) are common, costly, and potentially life-threatening in critically ill patients. Patients with suspected BIs may require empiric multidrug antibiotic regimens and therefore potentially be exposed to prolonged and unnecessary antibiotics. We previously developed a BI risk model to augment practices and help shorten the duration of unnecessary antibiotics to improve patient outcomes. Here, we have performed a transportability assessment of this BI risk model in 2 tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) settings and a community ICU setting. We additionally explored how simple multisite learning techniques impacted model transportability. Methods Patients suspected of having a community-acquired BI were identified in 3 datasets: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC), Northwestern Medicine Tertiary (NM-T) ICUs, and NM "community-based" ICUs. ICU encounters from MIMIC and NM-T datasets were split into 70/30 train and test sets. Models developed on training data were evaluated against the NM-T and MIMIC test sets, as well as NM community validation data. Results During internal validations, models achieved AUROCs of 0.78 (MIMIC) and 0.81 (NM-T) and were well calibrated. In the external community ICU validation, the NM-T model had robust transportability (AUROC 0.81) while the MIMIC model transported less favorably (AUROC 0.74), likely due to case-mix differences. Multisite learning provided no significant discrimination benefit in internal validation studies but offered more stability during transport across all evaluation datasets. Discussion These results suggest that our BI risk models maintain predictive utility when transported to external cohorts. Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of performing external model validation on myriad clinically relevant populations prior to implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]