Back to Search
Start Over
E-grocery logistics: exploring the gap between research and practice.
- Source :
- International Journal of Logistics Management; 2023, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p1675-1699, 25p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Purpose: This paper investigates the logistics management in the e-grocery sector. It contrasts the key issues faced by practitioners and the topics addressed in the academic literature, to identify potential misalignments between research and practice and propose avenues for future efforts. Design/methodology/approach: This work adopts a twofold methodological approach. From an academic perspective, a systematic literature review (SLR) is performed to define the topics addressed so far by scholars when analysing e-grocery logistics. From a managerial perspective, a Delphi study is accomplished to identify the most significant issues faced by logistics practitioners in the e-grocery context and the associated significance. Findings: The study develops a conceptual framework, identifying and mapping the 9 main logistics challenges for e-grocery along 4 clusters, in the light of a logistics-related revision of the SCOR model: distribution network design (area to be served, infrastructures), order fulfilment process (picking, order storage, consolidation, delivery), logistics-related choices from other domains (product range, stock-out management) and automation. These elements are discussed along three dimensions: criticalities, basic and advanced/automation-based solutions. Finally, the main gaps are identified – in terms of both under-investigated topics (order storage and stock-out management) and investigated topics needing further research (picking and automation) – and research questions and hypotheses are outlined. Originality/value: This paper provides a threefold contribution, revolving around the developed framework. First, it investigates the state of the art about e-grocery logistics, classifying the addressed themes. Second, it explores the main issues e-grocery introduces for logistics practitioners. Third, it contrasts the two outcomes, identifying the misalignment between research and practice, and accordingly, proposing research directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09574093
- Volume :
- 34
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- International Journal of Logistics Management
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 173930288
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0096