An Angle Precision Evaluation Method of Rotary Laser Scanning Measurement Systems with a High-Precision Turntable.

Rotary laser scanning measurement systems, such as the workshop measurement positioning system (wMPS), play critical roles in manufacturing industries. The wMPS realizes coordinate measurement through the intersection of multiple rotating fanned lasers. The measurement model of multi-laser plane intersection poses challenges in terms of accurately evaluating the system, making it difficult to establish a standardized evaluation method. The traditional evaluation method is based on horizontal and vertical angles derived from scanning angles, which are the direct observation of wMPS. However, the horizontal- and vertical-angle-based methods ignore the assembly errors of fanned laser devices and mechanical shafts. These errors introduce calculation errors and affect the accuracy of angle measurement evaluation. This work proposes a performance evaluation method for the scanning angle independent of the assembly errors above. The transmitter of the wMPS is installed on a high-precision turntable that provides the angle reference. The coordinates of enhanced reference points (ERP) distributed in the calibration space are measured by the laser tracker multilateration method. Then, the spatial relationship between the transmitter and the turntable is reconstructed based on the high-precision turntable and the good rotational repeatability of the transmitter. The simulation was carried out to validate the proposed method. We also studied the effect of fanned laser devices and shaft assembly errors on horizontal and vertical angles. Subsequently, the calibration results were validated by comparing the residuals with those derived from the space-resection method. Furthermore, the method was also validated by comparing the reference and scanning angles. The results show that the maximum angle measurement error was approximately 2.79″, while the average angle measurement error was approximately 1.26″. The uncertainty (k = 1) of the scanning angle was approximately 1.7″. Finally, the coordinate measurement test was carried out to verify the proposed method by laser tracker. The results show that the average re-scanning error was 2.17″. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]