Back to Search Start Over

Sustainable livestock grazing in Kazakhstan practices, challenges, and environmental considerations.

Authors :
Nendissa, Doppy Roy
Alimgozhaevich, Iskakov Kairat
Sapaev, I. B.
Karimbaevna, Tadjibaeva Muyassar
Bakhtiyarovna, Suyunova Zulfiya
Abdullah, Dahlan
Zokirov, Kurbonalijon Gaybullo Ugli
Sharifovna, Absalamova Gulmira
Source :
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences; Oct2023, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p977-988, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Livestock grazing is an integral part of Kazakhstan's agricultural sector, contributing significantly to the nation's economy and rural communities. The study explores both traditional and modern grazing practices utilized in the country. It emphasizes the importance of understanding livestock physiology, nutrition, and environmental needs to implement effective grazing management strategies. Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of livestock grazing are discussed, with a focus on pasture degradation, soil erosion, water resource utilization, and biodiversity conservation. Additionally, the paper addresses the role of livestock grazing in sustaining traditional nomadic practices and its significance for rural livelihoods. This paper delves into the practices, challenges, and impacts of livestock grazing in Kazakhstan, with a specific focus on sustainable modern management approaches. Grazing management practices, including rotational grazing, rest periods, and grazing intensity control, are examined in-depth. These practices aim to optimize pasture usage, prevent overgrazing, and promote healthier vegetation growth while ensuring animal welfare. Moreover, it analyses the existing policy and regulatory framework surrounding livestock grazing in Kazakhstan and evaluates its effectiveness in promoting sustainable practices. The current study also introduces dynamic forage rotation (DFR) as a new tool and technique which has privilege compared to the traditional management approach and improves the modern management approach. The obtained results show that the DFR has been improved averagely 55.77% and 42.52% compared to the traditional and modern management approaches, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17353033
Volume :
21
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173676281
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.22124/CJES.2023.7156