Back to Search Start Over

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction.

Authors :
Bi, Sheng
Zhou, Zhiyao
Pan, Lu
Qi, Guilin
Source :
Artificial Intelligence & Law; Dec2023, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p773-806, 34p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is an essential component of legal assistant systems, which aims to automatically predict judgment results from a given criminal fact description. As a vital subtask of LJP, researchers have paid little attention to the numerical LJP, i.e., the prediction of imprisonment and penalty. Existing methods ignore numerical information in the criminal facts, making their performances far from satisfactory. For instance, the amount of theft varies, as do the prison terms and penalties. The major challenge is how the model can obtain the ability of numerical comparison and magnitude perception, e.g., 400 < 500 < 800, 500 is closer to 400 than to 800. To this end, we propose a judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning architecture, called NumLJP, for the numerical LJP task. Specifically, we first implement a contrastive learning-based judicial knowledge selector to distinguish confusing criminal cases efficiently. Unlike previous approaches that employ the law article as external knowledge, judicial knowledge is a quantitative guideline in real scenarios. It contains many numerals (called anchors) that can construct a reference frame. Then we design a masked numeral prediction task to help the model remember these anchors to acquire legal numerical commonsense from the selected judicial knowledge. We construct a scale-based numerical graph using the anchors and numerals in facts to perform magnitude-aware numerical reasoning. Finally, the representations of fact description, judicial knowledge, and numerals are fused to make decisions. We conduct extensive experiments on three real-world datasets and select several competitive baselines. The results demonstrate that the macro-F1 of NumLJP improves by at least 9.53% and 11.57% on the prediction of penalty and imprisonment, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09248463
Volume :
31
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Artificial Intelligence & Law
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173152594
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09337-4