Back to Search Start Over

Long-Term Postsurgical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation (CROSS) Versus Chemotherapy (FLOT) for Multimodal Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors :
Gebauer, Florian
Plum, Patrick S.
Damanakis, Alexander
Chon, Seung-Hun
Popp, Felix
Zander, Thomas
Quaas, Alexander
Fuchs, Hans
Schmidt, Thomas
Schröder, Wolfgang
Bruns, Christiane J.
Source :
Annals of Surgical Oncology: An Oncology Journal for Surgeons; Nov2023, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p7422-7433, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: The question of the ideal neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma has not been answered to date. Multimodal treatment has become a standard treatment for these adenocarcinomas. Currently, perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS) is recommended. Methods: A monocentric retrospective analysis compared long-term survival after CROSS versus FLOT. The study enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) or the esophagogastric junction type I or II undergoing oncologic Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary objective was to determine the long-term outcome in terms of overall survival. The secondary objectives were to determine differences regarding the histopathologic categories after neoadjuvant treatment and the histomorphologic regression. Results: The findings showed no survival advantage for one or the other treatment in this highly standardized cohort. All the patients underwent open (CROSS: 9.4% vs. FLOT: 22%), hybrid (CROSS: 82% vs. FLOT: 72%), or minimally invasive (CROSS: 8.9% vs. FLOT: 5.6%) thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. The median post-surgical follow-up period was 57.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2–109.7 months), and the median survival was longer for the CROSS patients (54 months) than for the FLOT patients (37.2 months) (p = 0.053). The overall 5-years survival was 47% for the entire cohort (48% for the CROSS and 43% for the FLOT patients). The CROSS patients showed a better pathologic response and fewer advanced tumor stages. Conclusion: The improved pathologic response after CROSS cannot be translated into longer overall survival. To date, the choice of which neoadjuvant treatment to use can be made only on the basis of clinical parameters and the patient's performance status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10689265
Volume :
30
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of Surgical Oncology: An Oncology Journal for Surgeons
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
172866505
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13643-9