Back to Search Start Over

Patient-centred outcomes of imaging tests: recommendations for patients, clinicians and researchers.

Authors :
Thompson, Matthew J.
Zigman Suchsland, Monica
Hardy, Victoria
Lavallee, Danielle C.
Lord, Sally
Devine, Emily Beth
Jarvik, Jeffrey G.
Findlay, Steven
Trikalinos, Thomas A.
Walter, Fiona M.
Chou, Roger
Green, Beverly B.
Wernli, Karen J.
Fitzpatrick, Annette L.
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Source :
BMJ Quality & Safety; Sep2023, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p536-545, 10p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background Imaging tests are one of the most frequently used diagnostic modalities in healthcare, but the benefits of their direct impacts on clinical decisionmaking have been countered by concerns that they can be overused. Assessing the relative value of imaging tests has largely focused on measures of test accuracy, which overlooks more comprehensive benefits and risks of imaging tests, particularly their impact on patient-centred outcomes (PCOs). We present the findings of the Patient Reported Outcomes of Diagnostics (PROD) research study in response to a methodological gap in the area of diagnostic test comparative effectiveness research. Methods Over a 3-year period, the PROD Study engaged with multiple stakeholders to identify existing conceptual models related to PCOs for imaging testing, conducted primary research and evidence synthesis, and developed consensus recommendations to describe and categorise PCOs related to imaging testing. Results The PROD framework categorises PCOs from imaging studies within four main domains: information or knowledge yielded, physical impact, emotional outcomes and test burden. PCOs interact with each other and influence effects across domains, and can be modified by factors related to the patient, clinical situation, healthcare team and the testing environment. Conclusions Using PCOs to inform healthcare decisionmaking will require ways of collating and presenting information on PCOs in ways that can inform patient- provider decision-making, and developing methods to determine the relative importance of outcomes (including test accuracy) to one another. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20445415
Volume :
32
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
172337907
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013311