Back to Search Start Over

Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes with visible light-enhanced anticancer activity and multimodal cell imaging.

Authors :
Kang, Yan
Zhao, Yao
Wei, Yuanyuan
Zhang, Yang
Wang, Zhaoying
Luo, Qun
Du, Jun
Wang, Fuyi
Source :
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry; 9/21/2023, Vol. 52 Issue 35, p12478-12489, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes have drawn growing attention due to their photophysical properties and anticancer activity. Herein we report four ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes [(N^N)<subscript>2</subscript>Ru<superscript>II</superscript>(L)]<superscript>2+</superscript> (1–4, L = 4-anilinoquinazoline derivatives, N^N = bidentate ligands with bis-nitrogen donors) as multi-functional anticancer agents. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in a broad range of cancer cells and related to many kinds of malignance. EGFR inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, have been approved as clinical anticancer drugs. The EGFR-inhibiting 4-anilinoquinazoline ligands greatly enhanced the in vitro anticancer activity of these ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes against a series of human cancer cell lines compared to [Ru(bpy)<subscript>2</subscript>(phen)], but interestingly, these complexes were actually not potent EGFR inhibitors. Further mechanism studies revealed that upon irradiation with visible light, complexes 3 and 4 generated a high level of singlet oxygen (<superscript>1</superscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>), and their in vitro anticancer activities against human non-small-cell lung (A549), cervical (HeLa) and squamous (A431) cancer cells were significantly improved. Specifically, complex 3 displayed potent phototoxicity upon irradiation with blue light, of which the photo-toxicity indexes (PIs) against HeLa and A431 cells were 11 and 8.3, respectively. These complexes exhibited strong fluorescence emission at ca. 600 nm upon excitation at about 450 nm. A subcellular distribution study by fluorescence microscopy imaging and secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging (ToF-SIMS) demonstrated that complex 3 mainly localized at the cytoplasm and complex 4 mainly localized in the nuclei of cells. Competitive binding with ctDNA showed that complex 4 was more favorable to bind to the DNA minor groove than complex 3. These differences support that complex 3 possibly exerts its anticancer activities majorly by photo-induced <superscript>1</superscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> generation and complex 4 by binding to DNA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14779226
Volume :
52
Issue :
35
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
171923493
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1039/d3dt01661g