Back to Search
Start Over
Reply to: Uncertainty and bias in Liggio et al. (2019) on CO2 emissions from oil sands operations.
- Source :
- Nature Communications; 9/6/2023, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-3, 3p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Since synthetic crude oil production is reported monthly in inventories, we can scale flight measurements of CO SB 2 sb emissions (taken over several hours) to monthly estimates of CO SB 2 sb emissions and then correlate estimates of monthly CO SB 2 sb emissions to monthly synthetic crude oil production. Technical errors Fu and Legge assert that a single calculation error (not using the correct CO SB 2 sb /SO SB 2 sb molecular weight ratio) invalidates the results from the emissions estimation algorithm (TERRA). The CO SB 2 sb /SO SB 2 sb molecular weight ratio was used to provide a second and independent method for estimating/scaling up the CO SB 2 sb emissions from stacks to compare with the results using the TERRA algorithm. B replying to b L. Fu & A. H. Legge I Nature Communications i https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40818-5 (2023) In our paper[1], we presented an aircraft measurement-based assessment of the CO SB 2 sb emissions from the oil sands surface mining sector in Alberta, Canada, and demonstrated that overall CO SB 2 sb emissions were 64% higher than reported by the industry. [Extracted from the article]
- Subjects :
- OIL sands
CONTINUOUS emission monitoring
ATMOSPHERIC methane
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20411723
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Nature Communications
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 171580959
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40819-4