Back to Search
Start Over
The Utility of 'Minimal Access and Separation Surgery' in the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease.
- Source :
- Global Spine Journal; Sep2023, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p1793-1802, 10p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: To compare outcomes of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) to open posterior stabilization (OPS) in spinal instability patients and minimal access separation surgery (MASS) to open posterior stabilization and decompression (OPSD) in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. Methods: We analysed patients who underwent surgery for thoracolumbar metastatic spine disease (MSD) from Jan 2011 to Oct 2017. Patients were divided into minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and open spine surgery (OSS) groups. Spinal instability patients were treated with PPSF/OPS with pedicle screws. MSCC patients were treated with MASS/OPSD. Outcomes measured included intraoperative blood loss, operative time, duration of hospital stay and ASIA-score improvement. Time to initiate radiotherapy and perioperative surgical/non-surgical complications was recorded. Propensity scoring adjustment analysis was utilised to address heterogenicity of histological tumour subtypes. Results: Of 200 eligible patients, 61 underwent MISS and 139 underwent OSS for MSD. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between MISS and OSS groups. In the MISS group, 28 (45.9%) patients were treated for spinal instability and 33 (54.1%) patients were treated for MSCC. In the OSS group, 15 (10.8%) patients were treated for spinal instability alone and 124 (89.2%) were treated for MSCC. Patients who underwent PPSF had significantly lower blood loss (95 mL vs 564 mL; P <.001) and surgical complication rates(P <.05) with shorter length of stay approaching significance (6 vs 19 days; P =.100) when compared to the OPS group. Patients who underwent MASS had significantly lower blood loss (602 mL vs 1008 mL) and shorter length of stay (10 vs 18 days; P =.098) vs the OPSD group. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the benefits of PPSF and MASS over OPS and OPSD for the treatment of MSD with spinal instability and MSCC, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 21925682
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Global Spine Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 171374058
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049803