Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of a high resolution diode array for CyberKnife quality assurance.

Authors :
García‐Fuentes, Juan D.
Sevillano, David
Colmenares, Rafael
Capuz, Ana B.
Morís, Rafael
Cámara, Miguel
Galiano, Pablo
Williamson, Sandra
Béjar, María J.
Prieto, Daniel
García‐Vicente, Feliciano
Source :
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics; Sep2023, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p1-9, 9p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: The CyberKnife quality assurance (QA) program relies mainly on the use of radiochromic film (RCF). We aimed at evaluating high‐resolution arrays of detectors as an alternative to films for CyberKnife machine QA. Methods: This study will test the SRS Mapcheck (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida, USA) diode array and its own software, which allows three tests of the CyberKnife QA program to be performed. The first one is a geometrical accuracy test based on the delivery of two orthogonal beams (Automated Quality Assurance, AQA). Besides comparing the constancy and repeatability of both methods, known errors will be introduced to check their sensitivity. The second checks the constancy of the iris collimator field sizes (Iris QA). Changes in the field sizes will be introduced to study the array sensitivity. The last test checks the correct positioning of the multileaf collimator (MLC). It will be tested introducing known systematic displacements to whole banks and to single leaves. Results: The results of the RCF and diode array were equivalent (maximum differences of 0.18 ± 0.14 mm) for the AQA test, showing the array a higher reproducibility. When known errors were introduced, both methods behaved linearly with similar slopes. Regarding Iris QA, the array measurements are highly linear when changes in the field sizes are introduced. Linear regressions show slopes of 0.96–1.17 with r2 above 0.99 in all field sizes. Diode array seems to detect changes of 0.1 mm. In MLC QA, systematic errors of the whole bank of leaves were not detected by the array, while single leaf errors were detected. Conclusions: The diode array is sensitive and accurate in the AQA and Iris QA tests, which give us the possibility of substituting RCF with a diode array. QA would be performed faster than using the film procedure, obtaining reliable results. Regarding the MLC QA, the inability to detect systematic displacements make it difficult to confidently use the detector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15269914
Volume :
24
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
171369023
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14053