Evaluation of UGT1A1 and CYP3A Genotyping and Single-Point Irinotecan and Metabolite Concentrations as Predictors of the Occurrence of Adverse Events in Cancer Treatment.

Purpose: The variability on irinotecan (IRI) pharmacokinetics and toxicity has been attributed mostly to genetic variations in the UGT1A1 gene, responsible for conjugation of the active metabolite SN-38. Also, CYP3A mediates the formation of inactive oxidative metabolites of IRI. The association between the occurrence of severe adverse events, pharmacokinetics parameters, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A4 predicted phenotypes was evaluated, as the evaluation of [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio as predictor of severe adverse events. Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing IRI therapy were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected 15 min after the end of drug the infusion, for IRI, SN-38, SN-38G, bilirubin concentrations measurements, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A genotype estimation. Data on adverse event was reported. Results: Fifteen patients (36.5%) developed grade 3/4 adverse events. A total of 9.8% (n = 4) of the patients had UGT1A1 reduced activity phenotype, and 48.7% (n = 20) had UGT1A1 and 63.4% (n = 26) CYP3A intermediary phenotypes. Severe neutropenia and diarrhea were more prevalent in patients with reduced UGT1A1 in comparison with functional metabolism (50% and 75% versus 0% and 13%, respectively). SN-38 levels and its concentrations adjusted by IRI dose were significantly correlated to toxicity (rs = 0.31 (p = 0.05) and rs = 0.425 (p < 0.01)). The [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio had a ROC curve of 0.823 (95% CI 0.69–0.956) to detect any severe adverse event and 0.833 (95% CI 0.694–0.973) to detect severe diarrhea. The cut-off of 0.075 ng mL⁻¹ mg⁻¹ had 100% sensitivity and 65.7% specificity to predict severe diarrhea. Conclusion: Our data confirmed the relevance of the pre-emptive genotypic information of UGT1A1. The [SN-38]/IRI ratio, measured 15 min after the end of the IRI infusion, was a strong predictor of severe toxicity and could be applied to minimize the burden of patients after IRI administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]