Back to Search Start Over

Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of an Oncologist Group Peer Support Program From ASCO's Clinician Well-Being Task Force.

Authors :
Hlubocky, Fay J.
McFarland, Daniel C.
Back, Anthony L.
Friese, Christopher R.
Lyckholm, Laurel
Gallagher, Colleen M.
McGinnis, Molly
Spence, Rebecca
Lynch, Laura
Tomkins, Julia
Shanafelt, Tait
Srivastava, Piyush
Source :
JCO Oncology Practice; Aug2023, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p669-675, 8p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had deleterious effects on oncologist professional and personal well-being, the optimal delivery of quality cancer care, and the future cancer care workforce, with many departing the field. Hence, the identification of evidence-based approaches to sustain oncologists is essential to promote well-being. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a brief, oncologist-centered, virtual group peer support program and tested its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact on well-being. Trained facilitators provided support to peers on the basis of burnout research in oncology with available resources to enhance oncologist resilience. Peers completed pre- and postsurvey assessment of well-being and satisfaction. RESULTS: From April to May 2022, 11 of 15 (73%) oncologists participated in its entirety: mean age 51.1 years (range, 33-70), 55% female, 81.8% Ca, 82% medical oncologists, 63.6% trained ≥15 years, average 30.3 patients/wk (range, 5-60), and 90.9% employed in hospital/health system practice. There was a statistically significant difference in pre- and postintervention well-being (7.0 ± 3.6 v 8.2 ± 3.0, P = .03) with high satisfaction with postgroup experience (9.1 ± 2.5). These quantitative improvements were affirmed by qualitative feedback. These themes included (1) an enhanced understanding of burnout in oncology, (2) shared experience in practice of oncology, and (3) fostering connections with diverse colleagues. Future recommendations proposed included (1) restructuring group format and (2) tailoring groups according to practice setting (academic v community). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest that a brief, innovative oncologist-tailored group peer support program is feasible, acceptable, and beneficial for enhancing well-being dimensions including burnout, engagement, and satisfaction. Additional study is required to refine program components (optimal timing, format) to support oncologist well-being, now during the pandemic and well into recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26881527
Volume :
19
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JCO Oncology Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
169900522
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00068