Back to Search
Start Over
Heartburn-dominant, uninvestigated dyspepsia: a comparison of‘PPI-start’ and‘H2-RA-start’ management strategies in primary care– the CADET-HR Study.
- Source :
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics; May2005, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p1189-1202, 14p
- Publication Year :
- 2005
-
Abstract
- : There are few data on empiric, stepped therapy for heartburn relief or subsequent relapse in primary care.: To compare heartburn relief produced by a proton pump inhibitor-start or an H<subscript>2</subscript>-receptor antagonist-start with step-up therapy, as needed, followed by a treatment-free period to assess relapse.: Heartburn-dominant uninvestigated dyspepsia patients from 46 primary care centres were randomized to one of two active treatment strategies: omeprazole 20 mg daily (proton pump inhibitor-start) or ranitidine 150 mg bid (H<subscript>2</subscript>-receptor antagonist-start) for the first 4–8 weeks, stepping up to omeprazole 40 or 20 mg daily, respectively, for 4–8 weeks for persistent symptoms. Daily diaries documented heartburn relief (score≤3/7 on≤1 of 7 prior days) and relapse (score≥4 on≥2 of 7 prior days).: For‘proton pump inhibitor-start’ (n = 196) vs.‘H<subscript>2</subscript>-receptor antagonist-start’ (n = 194), respectively, heartburn relief occurred in 55.1% vs. 27.3% (P < 0.001) at 4 weeks and in 88.3% vs. 87.1% at 16 weeks. After therapy, 308 patients were heartburn-free (159 vs. 149); median times to relapse were 8 vs. 9 days and cumulative relapse rates were 78.6% vs. 75.8%, respectively.: An empiric‘proton pump inhibitor-start’ strategy relieves heartburn more effectively than an‘H<subscript>2</subscript>-receptor antagonist-start’ strategy up to 12 weeks but has no effect on subsequent relapse, which is rapid in most patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 02692813
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 16975562
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02466.x